Keep Left Hook Alive!

Dear Left Hook Readers,

November is almost over and we still have a long way to go to hit our second anniversary fund drive goal- if we don't meet it by the end of this month, we'll have to severely curtail and scale back our work here.

Left Hook started out as and remains the only independent leftist youth journal in this country. And by leftist, we don't mean the kind of "pander to the conservatives" politics you see from the Democratic Party and its hangers-on.

From the very beginning - far before it became popular - we took a principled stand against the war in Iraq, predicting the emergence of serious resistance early as November 2003. We've been publicizing and projecting the anti-war movement from the front lines, publishing countless ground reports, highlighting cases of abuse, interviewing student anti-war activists and veterans of the Iraq war, and demolishing pro-war arguments.

Young writers here have taken up a much wider range of important issues as well: from the oppression of Palestinians to the drastic costs of higher education in America, from the administration's malice in Katrina to the larger role of capitalism and neoliberalism in producing such tragedies, it's all been covered here in political analysis, cultural commentary, interviews, ground reports, and more.

And our material here is fresh, original, and from a unique youth perspective: not the same standard fare stuff reprinted and recycled all over the internet.

Of course, you already know all that - otherwise you wouldn't be reading this space right now, where we receive hundreds of visitors daily thanks to word of mouth and larger sites constantly linking to our material.

But you undoubtedly also know that, as a small, independent leftist site, we cannot continue without the financial support of our readers - that means you! There's just two of us students here at the helm, and though the cost of Ramen noodles remains relatively stable, we have to maintain our (pretty modest) funding goals to keep bringing you the quality and content you've been regularly enjoying here.

So please help keep Left Hook alive and donate today! Be it $10 or $100 - every bit that you chip in helps. Thank you.

Sincerely,
The Editors
Derek Seidman and M. Junaid Alam

After the Coup: 'Humanitarian Abyss' in Nepal

-by David Baake

On February 1st, 2005, King Gyanendra of Nepal staged a coup by dismissing a democratically elected parliament and seizing absolute control over the country. Since then, all civil and political rights have been suspended, independent media has been shut down, and hundreds of activists, journalists, lawyers, students, human rights leaders and others have been arrested or have disappeared. The former prime minister and the leaders of Nepal's political parties are under house arrest. The Royal Nepalese Army (RNA) has tortured civilians and assassinated others with impunity. The situation in post-coup Nepal has been described as 'worst locations of human rights violations in the world' by international human rights organizations [1]. The February coup is the second staged by King Gyanendra since 2002.

The King justified the coup, arguing that the parliament was 'incompetent' and that without absolute dictatorial control over the country he would not be able to defeat the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), a group of left-wing rebels from Nepal's countryside. A civil war has been fought between the Maoist rebels (CPNM) and the RNA during the last 10 years, in which an estimated 11,000 people have been killed, the majority of them killed by government forces, although both sides have committed atrocities during the war. War initially broke out when the RNA attempted to crush rebellion in rural areas of Nepal, followed by the initiation of the People's War, as it is called, by the CPNM. The Maoists may control as much as 40% of the country, and are currently engaged in a struggle to replace the monarchy with a Communist People's Republic. The CPMN army consists of between 10,000 and 15,000, accompanied by a militia of as many as 50,000.

While the US has officially admonished King Gyanendra after the coup, it has done little of substance to persuade him to restore liberties and has not cut off arm shipments. The US has been allied with the monarch since he came to power. The US has since 2002 sent $20 million to train the Royal Nepalese Army and 12,000 U.S. M-16s submachine guns, as well as military advisers to King Gyanendra, to aid him in his fight against 'terrorism.' These contributions have doubtlessly been invaluable to Gyanendra's campaign violence and oppression. The US has added the CPNM to its terrorist watch list, next to Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, and other notorious groups.

The US has great interest in perpetuating King Gyanendra's oppressive rule and in crushing Maoist resistance. Nepal's location is of extreme strategic importance, as it is located between the two fastest growing economies in the world, and, potentially, the two greatest threats to American hegemony in the world, India and China. Recently, the US' Asian policy has largely been focused on developing a system to contain these growing threats. Thus, the US has been militarily reinforcing its allies in the region, Japan, South Korea, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Pakistan, and Indonesia, and has recently been courting India's support for a potential alliance against China in the future. Nepal is a vitally important country, and keeping it under the control of a friendly regime is definitely a high priority for US policy makers.

In addition, the US is interested in destroying the CPNM for another important reason, namely, anytime a left-wing regime rises to power in a third world region, there is always a risk of 'the domino effect' occurring, and as we know from the Cold War, the US is willing to intervene anytime it feels it could possibly loose control over an entire region. The threat of an agrarian communism spreading in South Asia is quite real, as the majority of people in the region live in extreme poverty and much of the region still operates within a feudal agrarian system. Although Nepal has the lowest Gross National Income (GNI) per capita in South Asia at $240, other countries in the region are not much better off: Bangladesh's GNI per capita is $400, Pakistan's is $470, and India's is $530, and Bhutan's is $660 [2]. If the Maoists were to come to power, power structure in South Asia could change drastically. The US will undoubtedly do everything it can to ensure that the rebels in Nepal do not rise to power.

But, while it seems unlikely that the US would allow an ally to be overthrown in such a geopolitically important country, the US may have its attempts to meddle in the affairs of Nepal blocked by India and China, who, while they support the King, do not wish to have the US intervening in regional conflicts.

Agrarian Communism in Nepal: A viable alternative to the status quo?

Obviously, there is need for drastic and rapid change in Nepal; the 'constitutional' monarchy offers only suppression to the people of the 12th poorest country in the world. A new form of revolutionary agrarian communism may indeed by what is needed to fight for the peasants of Southern Asia who live in some of the world's worst poverty and at the hands of the worst feudal exploitation. The CPNM may be able to make revolutionary change in Nepal and could help inspire revolt in other poor regions of the world, if it comes into power. It claims to have a strong commitment to democracy and the rule of the people, and to stand "against imperialism, feudalism, fascism, comprador-capitalism and all reactionaries;" noble goals indeed.

It is not our place in the first world to criticize the tactics of those in the third world, especially since it is our first world governments supplying King Gyanendra with thousands of weapons with which to exert his dictatorial control over Nepal. However, if the CPNM is to be successful in realizing the ideals that it espouses, it must respect the human rights of the citizens of Nepal during its struggle to create a new state and it must be willing to work nonviolently when such an option presents itself. If they were to come to power, it must attempt to make the transition from a feudal state to a communist state as nonviolent as possible, and that once the state was established, citizens of Nepal must have their fundamental freedoms protected.

If the CPNM is not able to remain committed to these Marxist ideals, it may end up causing as much suffering for the people of Nepal as the vicious King Gyanendra and the world power that is using him as its proxy. We can only hope that the CPNM's People's War does not lose the people for the war.

---

If you found this piece useful, please keep us alive by making a donation to our second anniversary fund drive .

---

David Baake, 15, is at Lubbock High School. He can be reached at dbaake@sbcglobal.net. His blog is at /www.humanitarian.tk/.

[1] International Nepal Solidarity Network: 'Eyes of human rights'

[2] World Bank

For more on Nepal, please visit International Nepal Solidarity Network